. Often hacker groups systems to immobilize the crime on another person. So, let us suppose you've got 160 known hacking groups world-wide, most are loosely affiliated. Plus, you have government and international military or cyber-spy orders maybe adding another 50 or so for the mixture, some quite sophisticated. Recently, I was reading 150 page investigation report on cyber-security, cyber warfare, hactivists, and criminal hackers. Okay so let's talk for second shall we?

Among the chapters within the report indicated that it was simple to tell if a hacking group was part of the state-sponsored cyber command, or merely would-be hackers messing around because you may tell by their own style and strategies. However, I would question this because cyber orders would be wise to cloak as hactivists, or fiddling hacker teenagers when trying to break into something of the Company, or government agency hire a hacker.

There might be some that, but I bet almost all of them have several tricks up their sleeve, and they might even purposely mimic the methodologies and strategies of other hacking teams to shield and hide their particular identities - in other words, mix it up somewhat so they don't get caught. Would not they, or are we to consider and believe hackers are ignorant or something? They're not, they are clearly smart enough to break into almost each and every computer system on earth, they've been busy breaking into everything in the previous few years, these aren't ignorant persons - Actually, I wonder if anything is secure of sacred anymore?

Next, I'd wished to point out the authorities are busy employing these hackers that have expertise for their very own security computer needs. If these hackers were so naive and ignorant, then I doubt very much in the event the companies, and state agencies will be selecting them in the first place. Whereas the approaches and strategies, together with the approaches used by several hackers could on occasion function as a fingerprint, it could also be simply a false-positive or perhaps a disguise purposely used to conceal their particular hacking group hire a hacker.

And So, I thought it was quite innocent of that research paper, partly completed by a computer scientist, to even imply such. Even when they were speaking in hindsight or about how things have historically been previously, I believe they may be missing something. Sure some of the hackers that are not maybe wise enough to realize this theory, or are still learning might make such a mistake to always utilize the same tactics, but I doubt that is true for experienced hackers.

Hackers have learnt a lot while focusing on the English industry. They understand what is needed to make a success of the campaign, which explains why they are now advertising positions on belowground Internet channels. The minimal conditions are set really high. They want creative virus writers with the capability to produce both grammatically correct and persuasive web pages and spam emails.

With hackers looking inwards to hunt out and create rising stars, and with their increasingly business like approach to cyber-crime, will we find the development of cartels and turf wars as they battle for supremacy? The concept is an intriguing one, and would make for a fascinating anthropological study if it were not so very frightening Home Page.